On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Dan <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also, because when you absolutely, positively must have a unique key but
can't rely on a timestamp (even with 12 digit precision for the second!) to
provide it, what was the impetus to increase the precision? Curious
mind(s?) wants to know.

There are a few classes of impetus:

1. You need to know what happened before or after something else.
Even if you can't eliminate ambiguity, you'd like to reduce it as much
as you can.

2. You need to know how long something takes.

3. The question shouldn't be "why?" but rather, "why not?".

Note that all of these are subject to the seemingly inexorable march
of technology. There was a time when it didn't make sense to have
nanosecond precision. We didn't have any devices or applications
which could have made use of it. Today, nanoseconds matter in a
number of fields.

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.