Re: Are SQL Stored Procedures Really Transformed into ILE C and Compiled? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Are SQL Stored Procedures Really Transformed into ILE C and Compiled?
From: Ken Sims <mdrg8066@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:59:46 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:14:40 -0600, Nathan Andelin
<nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Several people assure this is true. But where are the references? I'm
primarily interested in IBM i references.

Several references for z/OS state that the C compiler is no longer
required, and they differentiate between "native stored procedures" and
"external stored procedures", where only the latter require the C compiler.

Based on my extremely limited experience with stored procedures, if
the stored procedure calls an RPGLE program to do the actual work, no
C program is generated.

Ken
Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views
of my employer or anyone in their right mind.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Are SQL Stored Procedures Really Transformed into ILE C and Compiled? , Charles Wilt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.