RE: Purge saved journal receivers -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Purge saved journal receivers
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:10:50 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Trying to understand his definition of hard. Maybe it has to do with his
compliance auditors on anything that's 'downloaded' vs straight from IBM.
Maybe it has to do with distribution to other customers and whatnot and
this isn't quite as simple as saying "you must have PTF such and such".
All valid.
I expect some argument about the PTF. There's always those who believe
the big lie: "If it isn't broke, don't fix it" and don't apply PTFs. Or
have the BOFH who makes it tough to apply PTFs.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Purge saved journal receivers , Justin Taylor

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.