On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Monnier, Gary <Gary.Monnier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In my experience browsers also take some care and feeding. Personally, I categorize web browsers as thick clients (just look at the size of one's folder) with all the issues of any other thick client.

Modern Web browsers are extremely thick, that's true, but they don't
have the same issues as "any other thick client".

First, most devices that could conceivably run your application
already have a Web browser installed. That in itself is a huge
advantage for deployment.

Second, Web browsers are relatively independent of the underlying
hardware or operating system. Even differences between browsers are
often handled fairly well by modern advanced frameworks. (Not perfect
by any means, but usually not as bad as handling the differences
between Windows, Linux, OS X, Android, and iOS.) In broad strokes, it
could be argued that Java thick clients are similarly cross-platform.
.NET applications are less cross-platform, and native binary apps are
of course not cross-platform at all.

These two are pretty big points in favor of developing for the
browser. Scott also mentioned that browsers tend to have less access
to the local system, which could be an advantage. I think other thick
clients are not without their own advantages as well, but I would not
lump them in with browser-based apps.

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.