|
Given the following situation:
A "Machine" file and a "Package" file, with a one-to-many
relationship. Each "Package" record is tied to a "Machine" record; a
"Machine" record can have zero or more "package" records.
I've got a traditional (i.e., non-SQL) join-logical on the two
files, with a JDFTVAL keyword, so that if a machine has no "package"
defined on it, it still appears, with blank "package" fields, in the
join.
i.e., if we have "machine" records
M1
M2
M3
and package records
M1PA
M1PB
M2PX
then the join shows
M1 M1PA
M1 M1PB
M2 M2PX
M3
Is there a way to set this up so that even if the "machine" has one
or more "packages," the join logical will also show a "no package"
record? i.e., from the same PFs, the join would show
M1
M1 M1PA
M1 M1PB
M2
M2 M2PX
M3
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.