Re: [Bulk] possible pgm adoption issue -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: [Bulk] possible pgm adoption issue
From: Dan <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:59:08 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

It bears mentioning that, if PGMA with adopted authority calls PGMB
unqualified, I can put my own version of PGMB up higher in the library
list. PGMB could be a simple "CALL QCMD" program. IOW, keys to the
kingdom, depending on the authority given by PGMA.

- Dan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: [Bulk] possible pgm adoption issue , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.