RE: PowerHA evaluation -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: PowerHA evaluation
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:02:25 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

So you're getting a second system.
You're getting some sort of SAN system to support both systems.
And it's a given that when you do you will dump iTERA and go to Power HA.

Or with both systems be local and you'll still be using iTERA to your
hotsite?

Have you ever tested running on your hotsite? If so, is it really
"useable"? Or is useable redefined to not include any of the following:
- any 5250 access
- any ODBC access
- any website access
Basically, if PR can print checks (providing all the hours have already
been entered) then that means the hotsite is a success?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: PowerHA evaluation , Mitchell, Dana

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.