Re: Is DB2/400 still the correct terminology fo DB2 on the IBM i? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Is DB2/400 still the correct terminology fo DB2 on the IBM i?
From: "Glenn Gundermann" <glenn.gundermann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 23:19:10 +0000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sensitivity: Normal

Same here.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Draper <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:12:29
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is DB2/400 still the correct terminology fo DB2 on the IBM i?

We just call it an IBM I and refer to the database as db2.

Jerry

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Is DB2/400 still the correct terminology fo DB2 on the IBM i? , midrange

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.