RE: iACS vs. Client Access on V7R2 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: iACS vs. Client Access on V7R2
From: "midrange" <franz9000@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 22:15:33 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

If someone is to evaluate the risk of Win 10 and the latest IBM i Access (or even the new client) it would be helpful if those indicating "it works" could list the functions working for them:
I need all below...
telnet (5250 emulator) - the obvious one
file transfer (both up and down and it's various options (I prefer other methods, but users...)
5250 printing
iNavigator functions (many)
AFP Workbench
ODBC
OPS Console
SSL and Key Management

Jim

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.