|
Richard,
DSPOBJD OBJ(*ALL/*ALL) OBJTYPE(*JRNRCV)
You can easily see the size of the journal receivers, especially those
related to your reorg
You must decide if you need to save them or not.
You have choices.
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Richard Reeve
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 10:45 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Backups taking longer after reorg
P10 running V7R1M0. Tape drive is 5746. I think you are on to something
with the journal receivers. If that turns out to be the issue, what are my
options?
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Steinmetz, Paul <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Rich,reasonable timeframe?
Can you supply more details for your environment, both system and
backup device used.
Are the PF you reorged journaled? Your journal receivers may be large
and you may be saving them, would explain the longer backup times.
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Richard Reeve
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 9:47 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Backups taking longer after reorg
All,
I did a simple dspfd to an outfile and looked at the percentage
of deleted records to total. I did the reorg on those that had more
than 10% deleted. All of the rebuilding of indexes is done but my
backup time is still 30 minutes longer than it had been. I am NOT
using the save while active stragegy.
I am doing an IPL tomorrow. Don't know what else to do. Any
help is much appreciated.
Rich
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Steinmetz, Paul
<PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Richard,
Are you doing reorg or reorg while active?
We run a similar process using reorg while active.
Reorg will be quicker, but requires exclusive use of the files, and
I believe will cause the index rebuilds.
Reorg while active will be longer, users can remain on, index
rebuilds are less, done concurrently.
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Richard Reeve
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2016 10:58 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Backups taking longer after reorg
All,
First, let me wish everyone a happy new year. I hope that each
of you is blessed this year with good health and prosperity. Now to
my issue
- I wrote a program that scans through libraries and reorgs files
that have many deleted records. Sounds reasonable
enough.....However, since running this program, my backups are
running much longer. Why would this be? Is there something that I
can do to get the time needed to save these libraries back to a
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
I have considered saving the libs to a save file and making the
system available while backing the save files up to tape (which I'm
assuming would be faster given the I/o rate of disk vs. tape). But
I'm perplexed as to why the reorg would add time to my backup.
Any thoughts/suggestions are much appreciated.
Sincerely,
Richard Reeve
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L)
mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To
subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please
take a moment to review the archives at
--
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L)
mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To
subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please
take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take
a moment to review the archives at
--
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take
a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.