Re: DB2 vs MySQL ... Oh I have learned a lot!

[Mike Jones <mike.jones.sysdev@xxxxxxxxx>]

> From a developer perspective I tend to agree with Joe.  Although, I'd be
willing to bet that DB2 LUW has a larger development budget than the DB2
for i team.

> From an administrator perspective, DB2 LUW, at a glance, looks like it
needs a lot more baby sitting and administration.

Mike


> date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:14:10 -0600
> from: Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> subject: Re: DB2 vs MySQL ... Oh I have learned a lot!
>
> Hi Joe
>
> There are some things that IBM i got first - so we're not so much the
> redheaded stepchild anymore. It was something recent - maybe
> row-column-access-control - I forget at the moment.
>
> Vern
>
> On 1/13/2016 12:16 PM, Joe Pluta wrote:
> > -snip-
> >
> > Me, I'm more upset that DB2 LUW always outpaces DB2 for i, but I've
> > learned to live with being the last one at the table.  Even a slightly
> > backward version of DB2 is indeed one heck of a powerful engine, and
> > there's absolutely nothing in the industry like the embedded RPG
> > integration.
> >
> > In my (not so) humble opinion, of course.  :)