RE: QTEMP objects and Different Users on the Same Job

I agree with your point as well, Buck, but it all depends on the needs of
the application too.

--
Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Buck
Calabro
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 10:45 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: QTEMP objects and Different Users on the Same Job

On 3/21/2016 10:07 AM, Jim Oberholtzer wrote:

Clearing QTEMP after a web request is assuming all the web requests
are serial and not happening fast enough that more than one might be
in process at a time. I understand security paranoia, but a healthy
look at what the data that's in QTEMP is warranted to see if it's worth

protecting.

I personally prefer the ability to monitor/debug all the web processes (of
that function) in a single table, vice scattered among who knows how many
QTEMPs.

--
--buck

Visit wiki.midrange.com and register for an account. Edit a page that helps
you, and because it's public, you'll help someone else, too!

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.