Re: Weak LAN Manager hashing permitted -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Weak LAN Manager hashing permitted
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 09:54:36 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Is it considered 'best practice' to have everyone change their passwords
when moving to level 3 in order to ensure that their 'netserver' password
on IBM i is correct?
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201604/msg01195.html

Our corporate policy is not to force password changes from IBM i but to
force it from Windows.
All users who have an IBM i account (other than Q* type) have a Windows
account.
We keep passwords in sync with IBM Secure Identity Manager. No, we are
not using Kerberos or EIM.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Weak LAN Manager hashing permitted , Charles Wilt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.