Re: Weak LAN Manager hashing permitted -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Weak LAN Manager hashing permitted
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 09:54:36 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Is it considered 'best practice' to have everyone change their passwords
when moving to level 3 in order to ensure that their 'netserver' password
on IBM i is correct?
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201604/msg01195.html

Our corporate policy is not to force password changes from IBM i but to
force it from Windows.
All users who have an IBM i account (other than Q* type) have a Windows
account.
We keep passwords in sync with IBM Secure Identity Manager. No, we are
not using Kerberos or EIM.

Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

Re: Weak LAN Manager hashing permitted , Charles Wilt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.