RE: Implementing Port Restrictions -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Implementing Port Restrictions
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:30:21 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I think if you just want to play with such rules you can read about them
at
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ssw_ibm_i_73/rzajb/rzajbrzajb0ippacketsecuritysd.htm

I still think that the firewalls a better place to put them.

Please don't give me the arguments about "belt and suspenders" or "defense
in depth". You soon start playing heck figuring as to where you're really
being blocked from.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Implementing Port Restrictions , Charles Wilt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.