RE: Shared pool vs Private Pool for SQL -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Shared pool vs Private Pool for SQL
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 20:56:42 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Jim,
We were seeing totally unchanged queries jumping from 20 minutes to 2.5
hours. Same volume of data.
Weird thing was you could restore it on other lpars and not have the same
issue. And, the restore was on a less beefy lpar and/or box.
This particular lpar needed the indices.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Shared pool vs Private Pool for SQL , midrange
RE: Shared pool vs Private Pool for SQL , Steinmetz, Paul

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.