Re: Shared pool vs Private Pool for SQL -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Shared pool vs Private Pool for SQL
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 07:19:44 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

By the way when we had the indices situation from hell we did the same
query against the same data on the Mimix machine with no issue.
Primary: 42A-EPXF
Backup: 41A-EPX6
Primary has more memory and CPU.
Backup actually had the IPL ran which applied the "next IPL" ptf's.

Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.