Re: Development Standards -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Development Standards
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:50:37 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I did a read loop, with minimal other work.
As a cycle program it ran much faster than switching it to a SETLL/READ
loop.
Much faster.

I could play with the SETLL/READ type program, and after much dinking
around with blocking I could start to approach the efficiency of the cycle
program.

Simply compile a cycle program with a primary file and read the
informational messages for more details.

...
Busy day and I'm on hold with IBM on a sev 1 issue.
Had to drop the other sev 1 issue down to a sev 2 just to give the first
one my full effort.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Development Standards , Jon Paris
Re: Development Standards , Paul Roy

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.