SAVSECDTA WAS: Really? There's still people using the QDLS file system on IBM i7.3? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: SAVSECDTA WAS: Really? There's still people using the QDLS file system on IBM i7.3?
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:03:10 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Your managers actually had a good point about the SAVSECDTA. We had one
change from well under 10 minutes to hours when people started using
secondary groups. IBM could point it to that exact cause by using
PRTPVTAUT. We stopped using secondary groups and that entire portion of
our backup is well under 5 minutes now.
I much prefer authorization lists over secondary groups.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: SAVSECDTA WAS: Really? There's still people using the QDLS filesystem on IBM i7.3? , Paul Nelson

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.