Re: New loser cost IBM i announced -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: New loser cost IBM i announced
From: broehmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:02:50 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Actually we do a lot of billing simulations as
well as hosting a backup Domino failover. So
I'd say no to that assumption. Actually, I
think the 8 disk 240 config. plays into it. Most of
the time peak usage pegs at over 90% depending, of course,
on what we are doing. :-)

Bill

From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 02/14/2017 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: New loser cost IBM i announced
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

We
notice lag on our P05 Power 7 when 5 people are
banging on it. And that's just development.

Developers can do crazy things. Most of the time, I suspect the server is
running at 1% CPU with 5 concurrent users.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: New loser cost IBM i announced , Justin Taylor

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.