RE: Storing source as DDL instead of DDS -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Storing source as DDL instead of DDS
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:43:07 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I can understand your skepticism, especially since I gave you an exact
example of that occurring to me<sarcasm intended>. And detailed how.

And Birgitta kind of laid her example out also.

But I do respect the questioning of whether keeping the source as a backup
is more risk than gain if people think the source is accurate when there's
no guarantee that it is.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Storing source as DDL instead of DDS , Tommy Holden

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.