RE: Storing source as DDL instead of DDS -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Storing source as DDL instead of DDS
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:43:07 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I can understand your skepticism, especially since I gave you an exact
example of that occurring to me<sarcasm intended>. And detailed how.

And Birgitta kind of laid her example out also.

But I do respect the questioning of whether keeping the source as a backup
is more risk than gain if people think the source is accurate when there's
no guarantee that it is.

Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

RE: Storing source as DDL instead of DDS , Tommy Holden

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.