|
I have a couple of processes where I'd like to have one or two optionalparms.
MCH3601.
In the past, I've just tried using them in a CHGVAR and monitor for
But... I'm wondering if %address() can be used instead. I think it
would be cleaner. In my testing, I've seen hex zeros for the %
address of a non-passed parm. That seems to indicate a *NULL will
be returned. Since it's consistent and not a garbage address, I
would think I could count on that logoc.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.