Alternatives to QNTC -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Alternatives to QNTC
From: Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:51:34 +0000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

We use QNTC a lot and have never had any real issues. With domain servers and EIM SSO, QNTC it is just a slam dunk. Now I'm trying to work with a Windows server that's not on the domain, and I'm stymied.

I need to access a folder that resides on a non-domain Windows server, using normal IFS operations. Can anyone suggest a good option?

TIA

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Alternatives to QNTC , Darren Strong
Re: Alternatives to QNTC , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.