Re: Performance - RPG vs Cobol -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Performance - RPG vs Cobol
From: "Mark Murphy/STAR BASE Consulting Inc." <mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 11:11:21 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

The SQL generator for Synon2E wasn't quite as good as the RLA generator when I used it. I don't know if that is still the case or not.

Mark Murphy
Atlas Data Systems
mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: -----
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 05/31/2017 05:10PM
Subject: Re: Performance - RPG vs Cobol

It could use SQL, it could use RLA, depends on how you configure the
model. I have only used RLA.

Not to prejudice one over the other, but would you mind explaining your
rationale for using RLA instead of SQL?

Follow-Ups:

RE: Performance - RPG vs Cobol , Mark Murphy/STAR BASE Consulting Inc.
RE: Performance - RPG vs Cobol , Steinmetz, Paul

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.