Re: SNDDST / Send Email fails on Certificate error

[Keith McCully <keithmccully@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Don for confirming what I expected.
Anyway good to know as we are due to upgrade to V7R3, although from V7R1.

I have never come across a signed server certificate without associated CAs.
If that were the case then the client should just reject the
certificate so bit of a puzzle why it was working previously.


On 25 June 2017 at 16:32, Bradley Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would be curious where they got the certificate from...  very odd
> there are no CAs associated with it.  Is that what a self-signed
> certificate looks like from another platform?
>
> I've seen one other like it on an FTP server.  Importing it to the
> *SYSTEM store solved that problem, so I didn't pursue things any
> further.  :)
>
> Bradley V. Stone
> www.bvstools.com
> Native IBM i e-Mail solutions for Microsoft Office 365, Gmail, or any
> Cloud Provider!
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Don Brown <DBrown@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Thanks Keith,
> >
> > But it appears DCM was not set up at R610.
> >
> > Which makes this error even more difficult to understand.
> >
> > An OS upgrade will not remove any certificates or remove the system store.
> >
> > And the certificates on the Exchange server are not new so how did it work
> > previously - Great question!!
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Don Brown
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:   Keith McCully <keithmccully@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To:     Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   25/06/2017 07:44 PM
> > Subject:        Re: SNDDST / Send Email fails on Certificate error
> > Sent by:        "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >
> > Going back to Don's original post he mentioned that everything was
> > working fine until the V7R3. Wouldn't the DCM configuration data
> > normally be retained from the previous release unless explicitly
> > removed?
> >
> > Or does it always have to be reinstalled on upgrade?
> > --