Re: Netserver SMB V1 and recommendations against ransomware -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Netserver SMB V1 and recommendations against ransomware
From: Arco Simonse <arco400@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:20:28 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I know IBM i is not the best performing file server. And we do have Windows
2012 servers that are fast and reliable with fileserving.
But we have those documents produced on the i, or they came in through the
webservices on the i, and it seems evident to keep them there.
I feel sad about moving off another part from the IBM i, but I'm afraid it
will happen so...

Regards,
-Arco

2017-06-29 13:43 GMT+02:00 Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>:

Actually, in many ways Nathan is right on this. Not to the point of an
absolute though. IBM i isn't really the best system for straight file
serving.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Netserver SMB V1 and recommendations against ransomware , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.