Re: CPF4028 condition 1: SEQONLY(*YES) changed to SEQONLY(*NO) -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: CPF4028 condition 1: SEQONLY(*YES) changed to SEQONLY(*NO)
From: Dan <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:28:01 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

BTW, I'm wondering if replying to 6-week old thread means that no one,
other than Gmail users, sees this in their feed? In Gmail, my reply popped
the thread to the top of my ML folder, but I don't know if other email
clients do the same.

Would I be better off starting a new thread? A lot of what I mentioned in
the OP isn't relevant, as shown in my reply last night.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: CPF4028 condition 1: SEQONLY(*YES) changed to SEQONLY(*NO) , Buck Calabro

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.