Re: Database I/O Modernization -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Database I/O Modernization
From: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 13:26:42 -0600
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To be clear, these are not my I/O servers, nor am I advocating for them.
I'm accumulating my thoughts at the following link, which also shows the
benchmark code:

https://rd.radile.com/rdweb/info2/ibmiapp02.html

fcusmstf if e k disk

The file is being opened for input, which allows for blocking of the disk
reads.

The I/O server opens it for update with no blocking.

That's reason for the difference.

The multiple layers of procedure calls are insignificant.

Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Database I/O Modernization , Nathan Andelin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.