Re: Show block nesting in CLLE source

[Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, I noticed that, Roger.

I wasn't sure if it was just me so I'm glad you see it, too.  It 
probably should be reported (unless it's already fixed in 9.6); I 
haven't reported an RDi problem in a long time.

Joe

> Has anyone else noticed this oddity?  If you have a comment line, the indenting of the next statement does not respect the previous "real" statement indent - or the comment indent either.
>
> Example:
>
> SUBR    SUBR(MySubr)
>      IF  COND(...) THEN(DO)
>          <some code>
>      ENDDO
>
>      /* Comment */
> IF  COND(...)    <- this line will NOT indent to align with block above
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vernon Hamberg
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 6:55 PM
> To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Show block nesting in CLLE source
>
> Hi Dan
>
> Have you tried the indenting of blocks for CL? It's in a preference. If
> you need to get the whole member to be indented with it, you can try
> putting LL on the first line and LL and the last line - the indent takes
> place in changed lines, and this changes the whole thing.
>
> There can be places where the indent isn't what is expected - I have to
> make some local adjustments, then get back to doing sections as needed.
>
> You could do this on a copy of the member, if you want to maintain the
> original layout. Just be sure to turn the indenting off if you need to.
>
> HTH
> Vern
>
> On 12/5/2017 5:50 PM, Dan wrote:
> > I need to see the block nesting in a large CL source member.  I have RDi
> > v9.5.1.1 and am attempting to use the same named function from the context
> > menu, but it is giving me "EVFG0102 Matching statement not found."  The
> > source member compiles with no errors other than warnings about
> > unreferenced variables.
> >
> > Google is not my friend.
> >
> > Would really like to see the block nesting in the source editor, but I'll
> > take a solution that is view only.  Ideally, I'd love to be able to
> > restrict a search within a selected block.
> >
> > - Dan