RE: Backup media -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Backup media
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:56:07 -0500
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

There are a limit to how far some of the existing libraries may go. But I
don't think James is hot to trot to get to LTO9. I think LTO5 is probably
the sweet spot for those servicing several clients with servers on aging
hardware.
Perhaps I'm being a bit crass but I would think it's the customer's
responsibility to upgrade from anything older than that. After all, you
are talking about supporting x-4 here already.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Backup media , Jim Oberholtzer
RE: Backup media , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.