No. It does not matter. You should be able to explain to an auditor that the accepted mitigation is to apply a vendor patch or disable the cipher. IBM patched the problem 17 years ago so the former mitigation task has been completed for any application that uses system encryption.

Steve Pitcher
iTech Solutions
Office: (203) 744-7854 Ext. 176
Mobile: (902) 301-0810
http://www.itechsol.com
http://www.iInTheCloud.com


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob Berendt
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 11:18 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: V7R3 SSL system values and SSLCONFIG settings - is it ok to leave all at default?

Does it matter that IBM confirmed that IBM i is not vulnerable when you fail all audits for using an obsolete cipher?


Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.