|
I believe the integrated file system (IFS) might be a little slower,
but it's pretty performant from my experience.
Our biggest issue was always the limitation of object ownership. A
single user profile used to be limited to ~1million objects they could
own (Not sure if this is still true.). This wreaked havoc for large
document management shops. We had one customer who had to create a new
object owner every month because of this limitation. Moved docs to SAN
and problem went away (But that's another story...).
I have not used MySQL in production on IBMi, but I've played with it a bit.
You can use all the standard MySQL engine mechanisms to store your
database in the IFS. Or if you want to be able to share data between
RPG/CL/Cobol apps and PHP/Node/Etc you can turn on the storage engine
that lets you store your data in DB2 but access it also as native MySQL tables.
The real question would be what is your use case and what apps do you
want to run ?
Regards,
Richard Schoen
Director of Document Management
e. richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
p. 952.486.6802
w. helpsystems.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.