Re: Java extensions directory vs Excel generation -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Java extensions directory vs Excel generation
From: Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 00:43:47 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I tried setting the system or user default CLASSPATH. I had to abandon it because it caused all manner of OS functions to fail. It's there, but test thoroughly.

________________________________
From: Tommy Holden <Tommy.Holden@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 9:56 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Java extensions directory vs Excel generation

By adding /poi to the classpath before the first java call, or you could use the shotgun method & set the system's default classpath to include that directory.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Java extensions directory vs Excel generation , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.