RE: RE: NAS device woes, IBM going to SMB 2.1?

Richard,

We'll investigate this. Thanks for the idea.

Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Schoen [mailto:Richard.Schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 5:57 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: RE: NAS device woes, IBM going to SMB 2.1?

Stop changing the ownership temporarily with your CRON job.

That could be causing an issue depending on the file permissions when
copied form the IBMi.

See if the files stop disappearing.

I found this older link talking about setting UID=0, GID=0 and root
squash.
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201508/msg00969.html

Regards,
Richard Schoen
Director of Document Management
e. richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
p. 952.486.6802
w. helpsystems.com
------------------------------

message: 3
date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:20:44 -0500 (EST)
from: Ken Meade <kmeade@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: RE: NAS device woes, IBM going to SMB 2.1?

Thanks Chris for the reply.

We see no evidence of a dismount and we actually see them as being created
on the NAS (we have a cron job running that changes ownership after
creation of document and so we were able to track down in the log files
some of the missing documents). It's after that point that they are
disappearing.

Ken Meade

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Bipes [mailto:chris.bipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 11:40 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: NAS device woes, IBM going to SMB 2.1?

I issues I ran into is, when the NAS mount is not mounted, files are
written to the IFS directory. Once you re-mount the NAS, they are hidden,
as you only see the NAS device and not the actual IFS directory it is
mounted over. Even a WRKLNK will show the mounted directory, not the
physical directory while the mount is attached.


Chris Bipes
Director of Information Services
CrossCheck, Inc.