I've not looked, but what about pre-reqs and/or co-reqs?
Often times those force and IPL.
Furthermore, many PTFs affect services that have to be shut down first
rendering the box to almost restricted state anyway. At first glance this
PTF more than likely fits into that category. Much the same as TCP/IP PTFs.
They can be applied immediate, but TCP has to come down first, so in effect
you've IPLd anyway since no one can communicate.
--
Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Stefan Tageson
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 11:49 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: PTF MF64534 for ROBOT TLS Vulnerability...
Has anyone on V7R3 applied this ptf?
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas3MF64534
I have it loaded but it requires IPL and I can't do that in the middle of
the day. I do plan on IPLing tonight to see if it > changes the Cipher
list.
Hi Brad,
Not going to argue - but the document above says "THIS PTF CAN BE APPLIED
IMMEDIATE OR DELAYED."
That's not true?
Best regards
stefan.tageson@xxxxxxxx
M +46 732 369934
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link:
http://amzn.to/2dEadiD
midrange.com
