Re: Why not test the lack of change instead of just testing change?

[DrFranken <midrange@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

What's incredible is some of the Rube Goldberg crap they rig up to get 
around the invalid ciphers. I'm like: "But if that thing fails you'll 
have NO IDEA what is wrong and nobody will be able to fix it!!" So they 
take that risk but "V7R1 is still supported!"

I leave this up on PCs in their department:

http://ibmiclock.mybluemix.net/


        - Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

www.Frankeni.com
www.iDevCloud.com - Personal Development IBM i timeshare service.
www.iInTheCloud.com - Commercial IBM i Cloud Hosting.

On 2/21/2018 9:23 AM, Bradley Stone wrote:
> Agreed, the problem is for years most were trained to not fix if it's not
> broken.
>
> I am pestering my customers as well to update...  Every week I get a few
> more that are on V7R1 and trading with a partner using new Ciphers.  I feel
> like a broken record.
>
> "But it worked last week!"