Re: qsh from cl

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Roger Harman <roger.harman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Am I the only one using ||, |<, etc for CL instead of the verbose option?

Not the only one, but I think most people probably don't do enough CL
programming to really keep in mind what those mean. There may also be
some traditionalists who always use *GT and *LE and so forth, and then
for consistency also use *CAT.

Personally, I find that the names for all the parameters are
maddeningly verbose, far more verbose (and far more maddening) than
*CAT and friends. I'm pretty aggressive about omitting parameter names
when I can.

John Y.