On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 5:17 PM, DrFranken <midrange@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And I concur by the way that Windows is still effectively a GUI on top of
some version, extension, etc of DOS.

Concur with whom?

I certainly don't agree with that view. In modern versions of Windows,
it would be more accurate to say that there is a DOS compatibility
layer within Windows, somewhat akin to what you were saying about PASE
being a guest of IBM i. See this question:

https://superuser.com/questions/319056/does-windows-still-rely-on-ms-dos

To be clear, it seems we're in agreement that IBM i does NOT have a
GUI in the Windows sense, regardless of whether you think of Windows
as "an operating system with integrated GUI" or "a GUI which runs on
top of DOS".

John

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.