On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Jim Oberholtzer
<midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Linux, Window, etc, all have a GUI (in the case of Linux X11) that run ON
TOP OF the OS.

Still disagree about (modern) Windows (for PCs). It sounds like you
have chosen to define "operating system" as something that
intrinsically CANNOT include a GUI. What you call "operating system" I
think is closer to what I would call "kernel". But that's not
important here. Because:

Nice intellectual discussion but using the GUI as a measure of the POWER
server as compared to other servers is a lot like buying a car because it
has a really cool dashboard, but no engine worth a salt. It's the engine
and the cost to run it I care about. Don't care about the GUI since I
rarely use it anyway.

Using the GUI to "measure" anything is a straw man. Nobody has
proposed that you make any decision based on the presence or absence
or quality of a GUI. Or any UI.

The point of bringing up other systems wasn't to measure them against
IBM Power. It was to serve as a basis for explaining (briefly!) what
IBM Power is to people who don't know anything about it. At least,
that is my reading of this thread. Maybe OP was ultimately seeking
advocacy advice, but if so, then I would think it makes more sense to
go for greater detail and accuracy, not "pack a few buzzwords into a
one-sentence explanation and call it a day".

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.