RE: mapping virtual FC adapters "in advance": Unable to access the device "fcs0 ".

<But I did get a coworker say his EDI batch dropped from 7 minutes to 3.

You already had SSD, correct.
Memory probably wasn't an issue, correct.
So P8 to P9 saw 200%+ improvement, attributed mainly to increased CPW CPU?
I know it's too early to tell, jury is still out.

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob Berendt
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 1:04 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: mapping virtual FC adapters "in advance": Unable to access the device "fcs0 ".

Actually I joked with my boss that perhaps we needed to figure out how to
retain "before" performance snapshots. He quipped that what really
mattered was what the users noticed: various run times. The gent who does
our ERP month closes keeps meticulous time tracking of each step. We'll
see how that goes at month end.

We seem to be having more problems with Domino on our main 9009-42A than
our CBU 9009-41A

WRKDOMSVR

Power 9-42A
Domino Domino
Server Subsystem Status
ARCHIVE1 ARCHIVE1 *ENDED
GDDATA GDDATA *ENDED
GDSHELP GDSHELP *ENDED
GDSSALES GDSSALES *ENDED
LDAP01 LDAP01 *STARTED
LUXNOTES01 LUXNOTES01 *STARTED
NOTES01 NOTES01 *ENDED
QUALITY QUALITY *ENDED

Power 9-41A
Domino Domino
Server Subsystem Status
ARCHIVE2 ARCHIVE2 *STARTED
GDDATA2 DOMINO03 *STARTED
GDSHELP2 DOMINO01 *STARTED
GDSSALES2 DOMINO06 *STARTED
LDAP02 LDAP02 *STARTED
LUXNOTES02 LUXNOTES02 *STARTED
NOTES02 DOMINO02 *STARTED
QUALITY2 DOMINO04 *ENDED

Power 8-41A
Domino Domino
Server Subsystem Status
GDDATA3 GDDATA3 *STARTED
GDSHELP3 GDSHELP3 *STARTED
GDSSALES3 GDSSALES3 *STARTED
LDAP03 LDAP03 *STARTED
NOTES03 NOTES03 *STARTED
QUALITY3 QUALITY3 *STARTED



Rob Berendt