Re: Another FieldProc question -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Another FieldProc question
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:52:52 -0400
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I thought of that too. Like maybe it only works in SQL and is ignored by
RLA. However IBM just doesn't do that with new features, especially with
DDL.
Testing has shown that SQL updates and inserts can update masked columns,
which flies in the face of this section.
If it had stopped them then I would have written a RLA program to test.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Another FieldProc question , Charles Wilt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.