RE: P7 V7R3 to P9 V7R3 migration recommendations / suggestions -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: P7 V7R3 to P9 V7R3 migration recommendations / suggestions
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 08:50:09 -0400
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

We've always been a big user of the IFS. And trying to figure out how to
squeeze performance out of tape.
BRMS and multiple drive tape libraries are much easier than the days of
writing out IFS objects to a data queue by descending size and having a
bank of tape devices reading that data queue to figure out what to backup.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.