Re: FC Performance vs SAS -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: FC Performance vs SAS
From: Holger Scherer <hs@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 17:34:58 +0100
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

haha just got some screen shots.
V5000 shows sometimes read latency > 40ms
and write latency >80ms

Think i'll leave office for today and go for a beer...
-h

Am 06.12.2018 um 17:00 schrieb Diego Kesselman <diegokesselman@xxxxxxxxx>:

Holger,

Can you check disk latency and disk waits?
You can use PDI or any performance tool.
RPG is really sensitive to latency.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.