Like it or not, I'm becoming more familiar with our hardware and I'm
finding some things that I consider anomalies. Case in point is my
DSPHDWRSC display. It turns out we have a combination of SSD and spinny
drives on the production partition. I'm just learning the ramifications
of that (including the fact that CHGPF has a UNIT(*SSD) keyword!), but
in so doing I decided to look at DSPHDWRSC on the development partition.
It seems like we have only spinny drives on the development partition,
which is as it should be. However, it turns out on that partition we
have cases where the same slot (I'm guessing) has two disk drives
defined (I think), one of which is available in that partition and one
of which is not (I assume). Yeah, I'm very, very confident of this
information. It looks like this:
Resource Type-model Status Text
DMP001 59C9-050 Not detected Disk Unit
DMP073 59C9-099 Operational Disk Unit
They're both in location U5887.001.G78J00V-P1-D2. I have no idea what
the -050 or -099 suffix means. But doing a little more research, it
turns out the resources that are flagged as not detected show up in
DSPHDWRSC on the production partition as Operational. That is, DMP001
is Not detected on the development partition but Operational on the
production partition. The reverse is not true. Resources that are
Operational on development (such as DMP073) do not show up at all on the
production partition in DSPHDWRSC. So which is "normal"?
The resource number could be a red herring, though. Although DMP001
shows on both partitions, DMP001 on development has a different serial
number than DMP001 on production. My head hurts.
There's one more thing that bothers me. Knowledge center tells me a
59C9 is a 300GB 15K 4K-block SAS drive, but that it's an AIX/Linux
drive, not an IBM i drive. As far as I can tell, the IBM i equivalent
is the 59E1, which is a 283GB drive. The main box is all 59C9 (and 5B13
SSD). We also have a remote CBU box with a mixture of 59E1 and 59C9.
Is it normal to use the 300GB drive on an i partition? Enquiring minds
want to know...
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.