Why not continue to use DFS-R if it's working great? IFS stuff on the IBMi is terribly slow.
-----Original Message-----
From: Franz.Rauscher@xxxxxxxxxxx <Franz.Rauscher@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 8:04 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: DFS-R like behaviour with two IBMi machines
thats true
as said they are using DFS-R now which works very good. the the access to the files must be gbit because they are tall (autocad,
images,...) so accessing the remote IBMi is not an option.
i dont see why nfs should help in syncing. can you clarify that. is there a nfs technique which i am missing that syncs two shares?
As additional info: the solution hast to be IBMi only. No NAS, Cloud or something because if IBMi only is not possible we stay with Microsft DFS-R
From:   "Rob Berendt" <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
To:     "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" 
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   27.02.2019 14:59
Subject:        RE: DFS-R like behaviour with two IBMi machines
Sent by:        "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I take it the "slow network" negates using an NFS share between the two 
systems?
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of 
Franz.Rauscher@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:48 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: DFS-R like behaviour with two IBMi machines
Hi!
I have a question according the sync of a ifs filesystem folder between 
two IBMi machines.
I would like to have a folder like /shares/public on two IBMi server in 
two different locations with a slow network between them.
is ist possible to sync the /shares/public folder between the two machines 
bidirectionally so that the users on each of the to locations can work 
with their local IBMi machine (via netserver share).
The solution should be comparable to Microsoft DFS-R (Distributes File 
System - Replication)
I have not found a builtin solution. Remote-journaling does not help in 
this case in my opinion because it does not  apply the changes from
machine1 to machine2 and the other way around.
Greetings,
Franz
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, 
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: 
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at 
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related 
questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate 
link: 
https://amazon.midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.