Re: limit users max active jobs -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: limit users max active jobs
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 21:59:08 -0600
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:13 PM Evan Harris <auctionitis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think it will depend rather heavily on what you are actually doing.

After reading Jay's rationale for IBM i REST web services, my take-away was
that they would be delivering JSON output directly to browser "clients".

JDBC/ODBC has its place but it depends on what you are trying to do.

Architecturally, I view jdbc/odbc as an unnecessary layer that only
benefits the platforms and language environments that require it, and the
people who are married to those platforms.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: limit users max active jobs , Evan Harris

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.