Re: quadstor vtl with as400 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: quadstor vtl with as400
From: Holger Scherer <hs@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:38:57 +0100
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

We had some issues with FC login which also might have been an issue on the VTL
software (early stage when testing IBM i compatibility), after that a lot of changes
to the VTL software have been made. So these problems might have been solved.
But personally i would prefer a direct hardware as there always might be an issue
with the access to the QLA adapter in the VTL hardware...

The direct setup (with older IBM x3650 and HP DL360 boxes) works great.

-h

Am 19.03.2019 um 12:36 schrieb Franz.Rauscher@xxxxxxxxxxx:

Hi Holger!

Thanks for the quick repsonse.

were there any problems with the virtualized setup other than performance.
so could this lead to instabilities on the as400 side.
we can only do it virtualized.

the last thing i want to rist is instability on the as400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: quadstor vtl with as400 , DrFranken

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.