To be up front, I think a separate HMC is a reasonable request.
But if one wants to run two small Power systems, in separate DC's, it can be a little costly to have separate HMC's in both DC's. Using both of the Power systems to redundantly provide HMC support to themselves and each other is an alternative.
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Holger Scherer
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:55 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: HMC 8.8.x withdrawal of support is April 30, 2020
This is only of some (!) use if you have multiple power boxes with multiple HMC LPARs and a lot of networking connections.
And in real world data center use even HMC/Customer systems are separated at all...
For all other users (as most of us) a physical box (or better: two) running the HMC software using two separate HMC networks (on two switch infrastructures) is the better option.
-h
Am 27.03.2019 um 16:10 schrieb DrFranken <midrange@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
It's really what makes an HMC as a partition on the system of little to no interest to me.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link:
https://amazon.midrange.com
midrange.com
