I second that the DETERMINISTIC clause should make a difference if you're not already using it. I'm also wondering how you're using this returned value. Is it simply in the select portion of the statement, or are you using it in the where clause, where you weren't doing that in your comparison statement. I ask, because when you say "longer than an index-based select statement", it implies either an advanced index, or, you're not using the right term.


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Salsman, Michael
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 10:13 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: UDF bad performance

Try defining the function as DETERMINISTIC.

Michael Salsman

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Justin Taylor
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 07:30
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: UDF bad performance

I have this UDF that returns an integer:
BEGIN
RETURN CEILING ( LENGTH * WIDTH * HEIGHT / 166 ) ; END

Calls to this UDF take a lot longer than I expect (about 21x longer than an index-based SELECT statement). I checked all the parameters, and the data types match verbatim so there shouldn't be any implicit conversions.

Any suggestions?


TIA
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.midrange.com_mailman_listinfo_midrange-2Dl&d=DwICAg&c=2S-2xx8Cum_thMfWs-kOOHQTwolPvSZ4PFLhr1wDDGs&r=ls1vEGzGwgqZJyzZs7sGJ8CtK97ty2KqTEwuy7Bm0ek&m=BEYrPw2fcoEGBjXw4NBdHt1LVNU_cTqq0v1BUOEwcJw&s=AOPPA4PHkGkmlBABSJUfUfTXDqL2I2S9yFaQF5HwfBw&e=
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__archive.midrange.com_midrange-2Dl&d=DwICAg&c=2S-2xx8Cum_thMfWs-kOOHQTwolPvSZ4PFLhr1wDDGs&r=ls1vEGzGwgqZJyzZs7sGJ8CtK97ty2KqTEwuy7Bm0ek&m=BEYrPw2fcoEGBjXw4NBdHt1LVNU_cTqq0v1BUOEwcJw&s=Qr0s-4_s8uF1I0paOGM4zJGSWG0J72irhG2likUsFPM&e= .

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__amazon.midrange.com&d=DwICAg&c=2S-2xx8Cum_thMfWs-kOOHQTwolPvSZ4PFLhr1wDDGs&r=ls1vEGzGwgqZJyzZs7sGJ8CtK97ty2KqTEwuy7Bm0ek&m=BEYrPw2fcoEGBjXw4NBdHt1LVNU_cTqq0v1BUOEwcJw&s=St6QlqY8NesgfCU_1fjF81Jl5iPxjYa5TspZyIAVI-o&e=
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.