If you aren't using the DNS server on your IBM i, why not just turn it
   off:
       ENDTCPSVR  *DNS
   Rich Loeber
   Kisco Information Systems
   [1]
http://www.kisco.com
   --------------------------------------------------------------------------
   On 5/17/2019 3:53 PM, Rob Berendt wrote:
 DNS stuff is served up by
 Resource
    ID     Option  Feature  Description
 5770SS1   31       5050    Domain Name System
 It is an optional part of the OS.  Really optional, like, if you are already running DNS in your environment on another platform such as Windows then you really do not need it running on your IBM i.
 If you remove it you will lose some commands that are helpful from a client perspective, such as NSLOOKUP.  I submitted a RFE to unbundle the client from the server was it was rejected.
 I have removed it from all of our machines which are in our DMZ.  The problem is that while IBM claims to diligently address CVE's (known internet hacks) with PTF's they always are way behind on bind levels and cause us to fail audits.  It's popular to hack, get your PTF's on.
 If you do not need it, but do not want to remove it, ensure that it is set to not start when TCP/IP is started.  See  [2]
https://imgur.com/Jydok8P
 -----Original Message-----
 From: MIDRANGE-L [3]<midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of T. Adair
 Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 3:34 PM
 To: [4]midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: QTOBDNS - disk busy percent
 One night this week our System i went from averaging 0-3% busy on all disks (which is normal) to 30-50% busy and stayed there.  This destroyed our response time, making the system barely usable.
 For 2½ days we tried everything we could think of, all to no avail.  Our CPU utilization was fine, our disk space was fine, there were no 'runaway' jobs, etc.  Our disks were simply getting hammered.  We brought in our BP and he adjusted our memory allocation, moving memory from two unused partitions, and that helped tremendously.  Our page faulting was within normal expectations, so why would additional memory help?
 But here's my real question.  While searching for the culprit, I ran across a system (QTCP) job, QTOBDNS.  I was surprised at how much CPU it was taking so I checked its job log.  There were hundreds (if not
 thousands) of entries that really concern me.  Example...:
 mixpanel.com
 aniview.com
 d.turn.com
 brealtime.com
 akamaiedge.com
 rubiconproject.com
 googleapis.com
 taboola.com
 (you get the idea)
 I have a basic understanding of what a DNS does but this really seems strange.  Could this job be the source of our original problem?  And here's the question I hate to ask, but need to:  is it possible we've been hacked?
 We're currently on 7.2.  And no, we're not up-to-date on PTFs.
 Thanks in advance for any thoughts on this.
 ~TA~
 --
 This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: [5]MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
 visit: [6]
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
 or email: [7]MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at [8]
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
 Please contact [9]support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
 Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: [10]
https://amazon.midrange.com
References
   Visible links
   1. 
http://www.kisco.com/
   2. 
https://imgur.com/Jydok8P
   3. mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   4. mailto:midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   5. mailto:MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   6. 
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
   7. mailto:MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   8. 
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l
   9. mailto:support@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  10. 
https://amazon.midrange.com/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.