That's the way everything is, and why I keep everything I can within IBMi.
For the SAN, they didn't want to give me the IP address because they said their network couldn't support my SAN.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Berendt [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 12:25 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Why adulterate ports vs using an additional IP address? Was: Ports IP specific?
Basically that came down to my last question: drudgery with the network people.
Did the Windows people object to the address because they wanted the SAN only for themselves or are they just that <word for a tight opening normally reserved for passing waste> on IP addresses?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
